96
9.
other evasions of duty the Hoppo's personal
loss was probably much more. It thus became
evident, as was announced by Viceroy Jui-lin,
in a proclamation dated the 1st July, 1868,
that preventive stations were needed along the
short land-frontier in the Kowloon peninsular
and accordingly "offices for the levy of the
tax on opium" were established at Cap-sui-mun,
at Lyemun and in Kowloon, while the circumjacent
waters were patrolled by armed boats. The se
measures were most obnoxious to the merchants
of Hong Kong; and in July, 1868, a petition
was presented to Governor Sir R.G. MacDonnell
by 112 Hong Kong firms protesting against this
"direct and high-handed attack upon the
commerce of the island" and stating that the
effect was "as though we were at war with
China and the port blockaded".
Thenceforward
this episode was known as "the blockade of
Hong Kong." It lasted many years and was very
detrimental to trade.
6.
In general the Hoppo's right to take
those preventive measures was admitted both by
the British Legation at Peking and by the
British Foreign Office. But whatever the
abstract right in the matter, a Chinese
administration is always attended by abuses,
from intention or laxity of procedure and these
forced themselves upon on the notice of the
Hong Kong community and intensified the objection
to. •
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.